FEATURE: HOLOCAUSTIANITY - YOU WILL BELIEVE!
The New Religion: Holocaust Fundamentalism: You WILL Believe
by Mark Green
[email protected]
Dec. 3, 2005
You've seen the films. You've read the books. You've taken the courses.
You've heard the news. Soon, your children will be visiting the museums.
Everybody knows it's true.
The era of mandatory belief in The Holocaust has arrived. Articles central
to The Faith include unwavering commitment to Jewish casualty numbers with a
full and complete understanding of the manner in which innocent Jews were
gassed, murdered and executed in Nazi Germany. Recalcitrant non-believers are now
being rounded up. The typical rhetoric goes: "these bigots deny the facts and
lessons garnered from humankind's experience during WWII. Their unique kind
of poison will not be tolerated. This is a democracy. You are under arrest."
Only this is not a movie. This is real.
In Europe and North America, Holocaust skeptics are being apprehended,
arrested and are now facing lengthy prison terms. Few people have noticed.
Nobody's supposed to care. Big media certainly doesn't. Nor the politicians. These
Holocaust-denying apostates include British author and historian David
Irving, Holocaust revisionist Ernst Zundel, German chemist Gemar Rudolf, and others.
Their crimes involve disbelief: they dispute the official version of events
involving Jews during WWII.
In an era where nearly anything goes, why does the truth need special laws to
protect it? Curious, that.
Beginning Jan. 27, 2006, and continuing every year thereafter, the United
Nations will inaugurate its first annual Holocaust Remembrance Day. This
Israeli-sponsored resolution not only institutionalizes and broadens global
sensitivity to The Holocaust, but it will surely aid in prosecuting individuals who
reject official Holocaust dogma. The State Church has arrived. It's creed:
Holocaust fundamentalism.
Question: to what extent do these escalating measures have more than nothing
to do with America's "special relationship" with the Jewish State, our war in
Iraq, and our saber-rattling towards Syria and Iran? Just curious.
Resistance to the global New Doctrine however is growing. Among the
arguments:
Laws regulating 'historical interpretation' are themselves a crime. Take
your Thought Control laws and shove it.
Primary question: How many Jews died (and how many were deliberately killed)
during WWII? How do we know?
In how many Western Democracies is doubting the "correct number " of Jewish
victims during WWII now against the law? (seven)
It's known that after the second world war, the Red Cross put the number of
Jewish deaths at considerably less than one million. That's still a lot of
dead people. Yes, it is theoretically possible that 6,000,000 Jews were killed
during the war, but--forgive me--I sense a bold exaggeration.
But aside from that, since when is skepticism a crime? Where are the bodies,
for instance? May I have a list of names, please?
Even the Yard Vashem Holocaust Museum in Israel, after 60 years, can only
muster three million names, and many of those names are of Jews who merely died (
or disappeared) during WWII, causes unknown. Many names appear more than
once. In a similar vein, while the number of Jews murdered at Auschwitz was
officially reduced by millions in recent years, the irreducible number of "six
million Jews" remains. Isn't it possible that there's some politically-motivated
chicanery here?
It is, after all, indisputable that some earlier "facts" regarding the
Holocaust have been streamlined and smoothed out for popular consumption. The lamp
shade and human soap stories, for instance, have been quietly retired. The
secret dealings between Nazis and Zionists during WWII have been suppressed.
Another ignored fact concerns the lethal Typhus epidemics in the death camps.
Why have they been airbrushed from popular memory?
One problem is that all the "experts" tend to be Jewish and show bias on the
subject. How many Germans died in WWII? Five million? Actually I'm not
sure, since their suffering isn't supposed to matter and therefore their
casualties aren't noted. What was the total number of dead in WWII?--50 million? How
many have died in wars during the 20th Century?--275 million? (that's Zbig.
Brezinski's estimate). Considering this, even if six million Jews were
deliberately killed during WWII, shouldn't we demand that the Zionized world stop
caring so singularly about Jewish suffering? The Jewish obsession with everything
Jewish is shamefully narcissistic and burdensome. Their defiant
ethnocentrism is an ongoing insult to the rest of the human race.
As for the "un-revisable" six million figure, Jews have superstitious reasons
pertaining to the number "six" for claiming that six million died. In fact,
similar charges about six million Jews were made, incredibly, in 1919,
concerning the fantastic number of Jews facing death during WWI. These nutty
allegations were even published in the NY Times. The claimants were Jewish.
But why?
Another reason Jews want to hype the number of victims is that they wanted to
have the greatest causality count so they could claim supreme victimhood and
reap the political rewards. Holocaust lore is essential to the precarious
legitimacy of the Jewish State. Just ask the Palestinians.
But the Holocaust story as now told is a libel on the German people, since it
pretends to show that German anti-Semitism sprang from nowhere. But the real
story is more complicated.
Rightly or wrongly, the Nazis blamed the Jews for America's entry into WWI as
well as the unjust and punitive Treaty of Versailles which followed. It's
also undeniable that international Jewry "declared war" (and launched an
international boycott) on Hitler's Germany in 1933. Even the outrage know as
"Kristallnacht" was provoked in part by a Jewish assassin (Herschel Grynszpan) who,
on November 7, 1938, walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot and
killed Ernest vom Rath, a German diplomat.
We know, for instance, that soon after the turn of the century, Jews
comprised many if not most of the leading political radicals in Europe. They were
instrumental in orchestrating and managing the Communist revolution which killed
millions of non-Jews well before Hitler's rise. Why aren't the Nazi-hunters
interested in finding any of these mass-murderers? Is it justice they're
after, or revenge and political advantage? The "innocent little Jewish shopkeeper"
archetype as peddled on TV is a self-exculpating myth.
However, that Jews were persecuted and murdered during Hitler's reign is
irrefutable. I've never seen or read a Holocaust "denier" who claims otherwise.
Not one. The extraordinary claim that "6,000,000 Jews were systematically
murdered" is what they contest. This deliberate mischaracterization of Holocaust
revisionism has been spread widely and purposefully by keepers of the
Holocaust faith. And the disinformation continues to flow.
David Irving, the imprisoned author of dozens of works on WWII, is now
alleged to have recently "recanted" some of his "Holocaust denial claims". But his
change-of-heart cannot believed so long as he is being held captive on account
of his scholarship.
One reader suggested that we call the search for truth in this matter
"Holocaust factualism". Good start. Both teams in this historical divide are
clearly inundated with advocates posing as scholars. The entire investigation
therefore has been rigged from the start. At the same time, it can't be denied
that those championing the Official Version are basically holding all the
political cards and resources.
But even if we accept their self-serving stories and invisible body counts,
it's still outrageous that the Jews and their lackeys deliberately ignore all
the non-Jewish fatalities in Hitler's "death camps". Holocaust survivor, Bruno
Bettelheim, writing in his book, "Surviving", notes that according to the
Communists in East Germany in 1945, as many as 11 million died in Hitler's
gulags, of which 5.5 to six million were Jewish. This means that, according to
Bettelheim, it's possible that as many as half of Hitler's concentration camp
victims were gentiles! Where are the monuments to these innocent people? Why is
their story being suppressed? Or should we now direct this Kosher Inquisition
towards Bruno Bettelheim?
Whatever your view on the casualty count (or the disputed gas chamber
stories), the focus must return to the core issue: intellectual freedom.
Historical truth doesn't need to be protected by any special law or speech
code. Irving, Zundel, Rudolf and others, need and deserve our unwavering
support if we intend to remain even nominally free.
# # # ps- The article above was inspired by the attempts at character assassination which began immediately upon David Irving's arrest. Please note that the author of the article below is surely eligible for Israeli citizenship. -mg
Mark Green is an independent producer and co-founder of
https://www.marwenmedia.com. He lives in California. He can be reached at
[email protected]
Freak total
:!:
Asiduo
Veterano
Frikazo
